2022 May: Loitering munitions allow less costly precision strike. (AI Study Guide)
Comments to: zzzz707@live.com.au LINK: Free Substack Magazine: JB-GPT's AI-TUTOR—MILITARY HISTORY
To use this post to answer follow up questions, copy everything below the line into the AI of your choice, type in your question where indicated and run the AI.
__________________________________________________________________
Question: [TYPE YOUR QUESTION HERE]
When answering provide 10 to 20 key points, using official military histories and web sources as found in the following list: https://www.ai-tutor-military-history.com/bibliography-jbgpt-ai Provide references to support each key point. British spelling, plain English.
2022 May: Loitering munitions allow less costly precision strike.
Overview
By May 2022 the war in Ukraine demonstrated that loitering munitions had become an important means of delivering relatively low-cost precision strike. Both Russia and Ukraine employed systems capable of remaining airborne, locating targets independently, and striking with accurate terminal effects. These munitions reduced the need for expensive crewed aircraft, lowered operational risk, and enabled precision effects at tactical and operational levels. Their employment illustrated how affordable, expendable airborne systems can complement or substitute traditional strike platforms in high-threat environments.
Glossary of terms
• Loitering munition: An expendable airborne weapon able to search for, identify, and attack targets within its patrol area.
• Precision strike: Employment of accurately guided munitions against discrete targets to achieve desired effect with minimal expenditure.
• Expendable air system: A low-cost unmanned weapon designed for single-use attack rather than recovery.
• Autonomous terminal guidance: Final approach guidance performed by the munition using onboard sensors rather than external control.
• Tactical ISR: Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance at unit or formation level that informs immediate action.
• Kill chain: Sequential process by which a target is found, tracked, engaged, and assessed.
• High-threat environment: Battlespace containing significant air-defence capability that restricts conventional air operations.
• Decentralised employment: Use of munitions by small tactical units with minimal C2 burden.
• Counter-UAS measures: Defensive tools used to detect, defeat, or neutralise unmanned aerial systems.
• Operational attrition: Losses of platforms or systems over time that reduce a force’s capacity to generate combat power.
Key points
• Loitering munitions provided cost-effective means of precision engagement: Compared to crewed aircraft or high-value UCAVs, loitering weapons required modest financial outlay and could be employed readily by tactical units. Their ability to deliver focused effects without risking pilots aligned with emerging trends in modern air-power employment emphasised in uploaded sources.
• High-threat airspace made expendable systems attractive: Dense and adaptive Ukrainian air defences limited the survivability of conventional Russian fixed-wing aircraft at medium altitude. In such conditions, loitering munitions offered a viable alternative for precision strike tasks that would otherwise demand risky manned sorties.
• Integration of ISR and strike in a single platform simplified targeting: Loitering munitions collapsed the detection, identification, and engagement phases into one system. This reduced the burden on external ISR platforms and shortened the kill chain, allowing rapid response to fleeting targets at the tactical edge.
• Small signatures and low speeds complicated defensive detection: Unlike fast-moving aircraft, loitering munitions presented small radar and thermal signatures. This increased their survivability, especially when operating over complex terrain or in cluttered electromagnetic environments.
• Affordable attrition expanded opportunities for repeated attack: Because loitering munitions were inexpensive relative to traditional aircraft or large UCAVs, both sides could accept losses while still maintaining strike pressure. This reflected a broader shift in air-power thinking toward mass through quantity rather than exquisite platforms.
• Support to ground manoeuvre proved significant: Units on both sides used loitering munitions to target artillery, air-defence radars, command posts, and logistics vehicles. These attacks contributed to shaping the local battlespace and reducing an adversary’s ability to concentrate combat power.
• Psychological effect on force protection was notable: Persistent threat from loitering munitions forced units to disperse, conceal, and relocate frequently. Such behavioural impact is consistent with historical observations on air-delivered threats influencing tempo and survivability of ground forces.
• Loitering munitions supplemented rather than replaced other strike systems: While useful, they could not deliver the weight of fire, endurance, or battle-damage assessment achievable through larger intelligence and strike assets. Their value lay in complementing, not substituting for, broader aerospace capabilities.
• Employment exposed limitations in endurance and payload: Loitering munitions carried smaller warheads, limiting effect against hardened or dispersed targets. Their relatively short endurance compared to larger unmanned systems also constrained operational reach.
• Counter-UAS capability became increasingly important: As loitering munitions proliferated, forces adapted with jamming, small-calibre air defence, and electromagnetic deception. This illustrated how defensive measures evolve in response to new airborne threats, mirroring patterns seen in previous air-power innovations.
Official Sources and Records
• UK Ministry of Defence Defence Intelligence Updates: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-defence
• NATO Public Statements on Ukraine and Air and Missile Defence: https://www.nato.int
• US DoD Briefings on Unmanned Systems and Ukraine Operations: https://www.defense.gov
Further reading
• Hallion, RP 2011, ‘U.S. Air Power’, in Olsen, JA (ed.), Global Air Power, Potomac Books, Washington, DC.
• Gray, CS 2012, Airpower for Strategic Effect, Air University Press, Maxwell AFB.
• Olsen, JA (ed.) 2010, A History of Air Warfare, Potomac Books, Washington, DC.
• van Creveld, M 2011, The Age of Airpower, PublicAffairs, New York.
• Evidence on detailed Ukrainian and Russian employment of loitering munitions in 2022 lies beyond the uploaded sources.