1945: Four fast-carrier task groups TF 38/58 across the Pacific (AI Study Guide)

Comments to:  zzzz707@live.com.au   LINK: Free Substack Magazine: JB-GPT's AI-TUTOR—MILITARY HISTORY

To use this post to answer follow up questions, copy everything below the line into the AI of your choice, type in your question where indicated and run the AI.

__________________________________________________________________

Question: [TYPE YOUR QUESTION HERE]
When answering provide 10 to 20 key points, using official military histories and web sources as found in the following list: https://www.ai-tutor-military-history.com/bibliography-jbgpt-ai      Provide references to support each key point. British spelling, plain English.

1945: Four fast-carrier task groups TF 38/58 across the Pacific

Overview
In 1945 the U.S. Pacific Fleet’s fast-carrier forces—Task Force 38 under Third Fleet and Task Force 58 under Fifth Fleet—could deploy four powerful carrier task groups operating simultaneously across the Pacific. Massing Essex-class and light carriers with integral battleships, cruisers and destroyers, these formations provided sustained offensive airpower from the South China Sea to the Japanese home islands. Their reach, tempo and logistic backing exemplified mature air–sea power, crushing Japan’s remaining naval and air strength while shielding major amphibious operations and tightening the blockade that made surrender inevitable.

Glossary of terms
• Fast carrier task force: A mobile naval striking force built around multiple fleet and light carriers, screened by surface combatants and support ships, optimised for high-speed, long-range offensive operations at sea.
• Task Force 38/58: The U.S. Pacific Fleet’s fast-carrier formation, designated TF 58 when assigned to Fifth Fleet (Spruance) and TF 38 when under Third Fleet (Halsey), with broadly similar composition but different higher command arrangements.
• Task group: A subordinate formation within a task force, such as TG 38.1 or 58.3, normally comprising several carriers plus escorts, capable of independent operations or concentration for major strikes.
• Combat air patrol: Fighter aircraft maintained over the fleet or a defended area to intercept enemy aircraft, providing the primary air defence for fast-carrier groups against reconnaissance, bombers and kamikaze attacks.
• Fleet train: Specialised logistic support groups of oilers, ammunition and stores ships, plus escorts, enabling fast-carrier forces to replenish at sea and maintain high sortie rates far from fixed bases.
• Operational reach: The distance and duration across which a force can employ military power, shaped by basing, logistics, platform endurance and command arrangements, and dramatically extended by fast-carrier forces in 1945.
• Kamikaze: Japanese special-attack aircraft deliberately crashed into Allied ships, forcing fast-carrier groups to refine air defence, radar control and damage-control practices during the 1945 Okinawa campaign and home-island raids.
• Joint air–sea campaign: An integrated operational design in which naval aviation, land-based air power and surface and amphibious forces are planned and employed together to achieve a theatre-level objective, as in Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

Key points
• Mature fast-carrier system: By early 1945 TF 38/58 comprised four task groups, each with several fleet and light carriers generating dense fighter and strike sorties. Muller, “The Air War in the Pacific” in Olsen, A History of Air Warfare, emphasises that this represented a fully developed carrier system: robust command-and-control, radar-directed defence, cyclic strike routines and practiced deck handling delivering near-continuous pressure on Japanese forces.
• Air–sea production and mass: O’Brien, How the War Was Won, shows that American industrial output allowed dozens of Essex-class and light carriers, plus replacement aircraft and crews, to be fielded simultaneously. This mass was crucial: four task groups could disperse to cover huge ocean areas or concentrate for overwhelming blows, demonstrating how control of production underpinned operational freedom and made sustained carrier aviation decisive in 1945.
• Logistics and the fleet train: Sustained operation of four widely separated carrier groups depended on underway replenishment, with oilers and support ships forming an indispensable fleet train. Winton, Air Power at Sea 1939–45, and O’Brien both stress that this logistic architecture turned the Pacific into a manoeuvre space rather than a barrier, letting TF 38/58 maintain high sortie rates close to Japan without relying on vulnerable forward bases.
• From decisive battles to rolling attrition: Earlier carrier clashes like Midway were short, high-stakes engagements; by 1945, fast carriers waged a rolling campaign of attrition against Japanese airfields, shipping and naval units. Van Creveld, The Age of Airpower, argues that this shift reflected overwhelming Allied air–sea superiority, with TF 38/58 able to choose when and where to strike, steadily eroding Japan’s capacity to contest the maritime domain.
• Enabling amphibious operations: Carrier airpower under TF 58 covered the Iwo Jima and Okinawa landings, providing both pre-landing strikes and close air support, while TF 38 later raided the home islands. Muller and Spires, Air Power for Patton’s Army, together highlight a broader pattern: tactical air forces at sea and on land increasingly integrated with ground manoeuvre, giving amphibious and land commanders responsive, theatre-wide firepower.
• Countering kamikaze: The Okinawa campaign exposed the vulnerability of even powerful carrier groups to concentrated kamikaze attacks. Winton and O’Brien describe how TF 58 refined layered radar pickets, combat air patrols and anti-aircraft procedures, accepting heavy damage yet preserving core combat capability. This experience underlined the need for dense, integrated air defence around high-value naval platforms in any high-intensity theatre.
• Deep strikes on Japan: As B-29 operations expanded, TF 38/58 struck airfields, shipyards, and transport hubs across Kyushu and Honshu, complementing strategic bombing and tightening the maritime blockade. O’Brien and Gray, Airpower for Strategic Effect, argue that these raids did more than destroy hardware: they disrupted Japanese mobilisation and movement, making it increasingly impossible to sustain coherent defence or to concentrate forces for decisive operations.
• Command flexibility and TF 38/58 dual identity: The dual-numbering of the fast-carrier force reflected a deliberate Nimitz innovation: the same ships alternated between Third and Fifth Fleet commands, allowing one staff to plan while the other fought. Gray and Olsen, Global Air Power, use this arrangement to illustrate how organisational design can maximise tempo, with four task groups providing the physical means for truly continuous, theatre-wide naval-air operations.
• Control of mobility and the wider Pacific: By mid-1945 TF 38/58 and supporting forces effectively controlled Japan’s maritime mobility, reducing coastal shipping, strangling fuel flows and denying safe movement to any remaining major fleet units. O’Brien argues that such air–sea control meant Japan’s army, however large, was strategically paralysed: it could not be supplied, redeployed or effectively reinforced against Allied offensives across multiple axes.
• Legacy for post-war carrier doctrine: The 1945 experience of four fast-carrier task groups operating simultaneously shaped post-war U.S. and allied doctrine on carrier battle groups, forward presence and sea-based air superiority. Gray and Van Creveld note that later concepts of carrier strike groups, nuclear-era deterrent patrols and modern expeditionary operations all draw on these lessons of massed yet flexible sea-based aviation, supported by robust logistics and joint integration.

Official Sources and Records
• AI Tutor Military History, Official Sources – Air and Maritime Power in the Second World War: https://www.ai-tutor-military-history.com/official-sources-military-history
• Samuel Eliot Morison, History of United States Naval Operations in World War II, Vol. 14, Victory in the Pacific, 1945: https://archive.org/details/historyofuniteds0000mori_n6c6 (Internet Archive)
• Naval History and Heritage Command, Publications by Subject – World War II, U.S. Navy Operations in World War II: https://www.history.navy.mil/research/publications/publications-by-subject.html (Naval History and Heritage Command)
• US Marine Corps, History of U.S. Marine Corps Operations in World War II, Vol. V, Victory and Occupation: https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/Publications/History%20of%20U.S.%20Marine%20Corps%20Operations%20in%20WWII%20Vol%20V_Victory%20and%20Occupation%20%20PCN%2019000262800.pdf (U.S. Marine Corps)

Further reading
• Muller, R.R., 2010. ‘The Air War in the Pacific, 1941–1945’, in Olsen, J.A. (ed.), A History of Air Warfare. Potomac Books, Dulles, VA.
• O’Brien, P.P., 2015. How the War Was Won: Air–Sea Power and Allied Victory in World War II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Winton, J., 1976. Air Power at Sea 1939–45. Sidgwick & Jackson, London.
• Gray, C.S., 2012. Airpower for Strategic Effect. Air University Press, Maxwell AFB, AL.
• Olsen, J.A. (ed.), 2011. Global Air Power. Potomac Books, Dulles, VA.
• Van Creveld, M., 2011. The Age of Airpower. PublicAffairs, New York.