𝟏𝟗𝟕𝟑 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐞: 𝐑𝐀𝐀𝐅 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐃𝐲𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐅-𝟏𝟏𝟏𝐂 (AI Study Guide)

Comments to:  zzzz707@live.com.au   LINK: Free Substack Magazine: JB-GPT's AI-TUTOR—MILITARY HISTORY

To use this post to answer follow up questions, copy everything below the line into the AI of your choice, type in your question where indicated and run the AI.

__________________________________________________________________

Question: [TYPE YOUR QUESTION HERE]
When answering provide 10 to 20 key points, using official military histories and web sources as found in the following list: https://www.ai-tutor-military-history.com/bibliography-jbgpt-ai      Provide references to support each key point. British spelling, plain English.

1973 June: RAAF Introduces General Dynamics F-111C

Overview
The F-111C entered service in a markedly different strategic environment from that in which it was ordered. Post-Vietnam retrenchment, British withdrawal east of Suez, and uncertainty over allied availability elevated the requirement for an independently controlled strike capability. The aircraft’s combination of range, payload, penetration, and survivability allowed the RAAF to hold regional targets at risk without forward basing, fundamentally altering Australia’s strategic calculus.

Glossary of terms
• Strategic strike: Long-range attack against targets of operational or strategic value.
• Swing-wing: Variable-geometry wing allowing optimisation for take-off, cruise, and penetration.
• Terrain-following radar (TFR): Radar enabling automatic low-level flight to evade detection.
• Self-reliant defence: Policy emphasising national capability under Australian command.
• Independent command: Employment of forces without reliance on allied operational control.

Key points
• Origins in the Canberra Replacement Decision: The F-111C was ordered in 1963 to replace the ageing Canberra bomber, whose survivability against modern air defences was declining. The requirement focused on range and penetration rather than mass bombing, reflecting Australia’s geography and limited force size. This decision prioritised quality and reach over numerical strength.
• Protracted acquisition and strategic patience: Developmental delays, technical problems, and political scrutiny postponed delivery for nearly a decade. Rather than cancel the programme, successive governments accepted the delay as the price of acquiring a transformational capability, demonstrating unusual strategic patience in Australian defence procurement.
• Transformation of strike geometry: The F-111C’s unrefuelled range and payload enabled strikes deep into South-East Asia from Australian bases. This collapsed the tyranny of distance that had previously constrained Australian strike planning and removed dependence on vulnerable forward bases.
• Penetration over air superiority: Unlike fighter-bombers, the F-111C was designed to penetrate defended airspace at low level using speed and terrain masking rather than air superiority. This aligned with Australian assumptions that control of the air could not be guaranteed in regional contingencies.
• Precision and controlled effects: Navigation and attack systems enabled accurate delivery against point targets, supporting a doctrine of selective, politically controlled strike rather than area bombardment. This suited Australia’s strategic preference for deterrence by denial rather than punishment.
• Independent national command: Unlike earlier bomber commitments in Korea or Vietnam, the F-111C was conceived for employment under Australian command. This reflected erosion of automatic allied availability and the emergence of self-reliance as a core defence policy principle.
• Impact on force structure and training: Operating the F-111C required new standards in aircrew training, maintenance discipline, and systems management. The aircraft drove professionalisation across the RAAF, particularly in engineering, mission planning, and airworthiness governance.
• Deterrence value disproportionate to numbers: With a relatively small fleet, the F-111C exerted deterrent effect through uncertainty and reach. Potential adversaries had to assume that critical assets could be struck without warning, reinforcing deterrence through ambiguity rather than presence.
• Strategic signalling in the post-Vietnam era: Acceptance of the F-111C in 1973 signalled continuity of Australian strategic resolve despite withdrawal from Vietnam. It demonstrated that Australia intended to retain credible military options independent of expeditionary commitments.
• Enduring doctrinal legacy: The F-111C shaped Australian air power thinking for decades. It entrenched the primacy of long-range strike, precision, and national control as defining features of RAAF doctrine, influencing subsequent debates over air combat capability even after its retirement.

Official Sources and Records

(Paste sources and instructions below into an AI to locate the sources.)

Instructions to AI: Locate the cited official history, archival series, or institutional record using the citation text provided; supply current links and identify the controlling authority.

• Australian War Memorial, Canberra; authorised official histories of Australia’s post-1945 defence policy and RAAF operations, Air Force Studies series; associated curatorial research files and archival holdings including RAAF operational record books, aircraft accident summaries, and procurement correspondence held within AWM series A705, A9186, and related Air Force record groups.
• Royal Australian Air Force, Air Power Development Centre, Canberra; institutional histories, doctrinal publications, and historical monographs drawing on Air Board minutes, Directorate of Flying Safety records, and declassified policy papers concerning strike doctrine, aircraft introduction, and force structure.
• Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Defence and predecessor Department of Air; Annual Reports to Parliament for the 1960s and early 1970s, Cabinet submissions, Air Board memoranda, and acquisition files held by the National Archives of Australia in Canberra and Melbourne repositories, including record series relating to aircraft procurement, operational policy, and accident investigation.

Further reading
• Grey, Jeffrey, 2008, A Military History of Australia, 3rd edition, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
• Horner, David, 2022, Strategy and Command: Issues in Australia’s Twentieth-Century Wars, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Stephens, Alan (ed.), 2001, The War in the Air, 1914–1994, Maxwell Air Force Base: Air University Press.
• Royal Australian Air Force, 2013, AAP 1000–H: The Australian Experience of Air Power, Canberra: Air Power Development Centre.