JB-GPTs - 2016–17: Jericho Implementation

2016–17: Plan Jericho Implementation Phase (AI Study Guide)

Comments to: zzzz707@live.com.au LINK: Free Substack Magazine: JB-GPT's AI-TUTOR—MILITARY HISTORY

To use this post to answer follow up questions, copy everything below the line into the AI of your choice, type in your question where indicated and run the AI.

__________________________________________________________________

Question: [TYPE YOUR QUESTION HERE]
When answering provide 10 to 20 key points, using official military histories and web sources as found in the following list: https://www.ai-tutor-military-history.com/bibliography-jbgpt-ai Provide references to support each key point. British spelling, plain English.

2016–17: Plan Jericho Implementation Phase

Overview

Plan Jericho entered its decisive implementation phase during 2016–2017. The central institutional problem confronting the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) was structural, not technical: acquisition of the F-35A did not guarantee fifth-generation combat effectiveness. Fifth-generation capability required integrated command architectures, digitally fluent workforce models, revised governance mechanisms, and experimentation frameworks capable of breaking platform-centric legacy habits.

Drawing on the doctrinal foundations in The Australian Experience of Air Power and The Air Power Manual , this analysis argues that 2016–2017 represents the point at which Plan Jericho shifted from narrative ambition to embedded institutional reform.

Glossary of Terms

Fifth-Generation Capability: Combat power derived from sensor fusion, network integration, stealth, and decision superiority rather than platform performance alone.
System-of-Systems: Operational architecture in which platforms function as nodes within a distributed, information-centric combat network.
Institutional Reform: Structural adjustments to governance, workforce, doctrine, and experimentation frameworks.
Integration Risk: The danger that new technology is absorbed into legacy organisational practices.
Decision Superiority: Operational advantage derived from faster, more accurate information processing and command execution.

Key Points

• Political and Strategic Context: The 2016 Defence White Paper reinforced Australia’s requirement for regionally credible, coalition-integrated air power. Alliance interoperability with the United States imposed structural demands beyond platform acquisition. Plan Jericho implementation therefore responded to strategic necessity, not institutional preference, aligning air power transformation with national defence policy priorities.
• Alliance Architecture as a Structural Constraint: Fifth-generation integration was inseparable from coalition interoperability. The F-35 program embedded Australia within US-led digital architectures. Failure to reform governance and command systems would have reduced Australia to a platform contributor rather than an integrated combat partner. Alliance dynamics therefore acted as a primary driver of institutional change.
• Platform Substitution Risk: Historical experience demonstrates that technology without organisational adaptation produces limited strategic effect . During 2016–2017, RAAF leadership explicitly recognised the risk of employing the F-35 within legacy command constructs. Plan Jericho implementation aimed to prevent repetition of platform-centric absorption patterns seen in earlier air power transitions.
• Governance Restructuring: Implementation required new governance models capable of accelerating innovation and bypassing bureaucratic inertia. Traditional hierarchical decision-making processes were poorly suited to rapid digital integration. Plan Jericho created dedicated innovation and integration structures, reducing latency between experimentation, validation, and operational adoption.
• Workforce Transformation as Decisive Factor: Fifth-generation capability depends more on cognitive integration than aircraft performance. Workforce reform during 2016–2017 prioritised digital literacy, cross-domain awareness, and systems thinking. The Air Power Manual identifies human capital as the critical enabler of air power effectiveness . Jericho institutionalised this principle operationally.
• Experimentation and Disruptive Innovation: Plan Jericho’s implementation phase emphasised experimentation partnerships with industry and academia. This reduced acquisition-cycle rigidity and encouraged rapid prototyping. The structural aim was to embed adaptive learning mechanisms inside Air Force rather than rely solely on traditional capability development pipelines.
• Joint Integration Imperative: Fifth-generation air power cannot operate as a service-isolated capability. Integration with Army and Navy systems became essential to operational credibility. Jericho implementation therefore focused on cross-domain connectivity, ensuring that the F-35 functioned as a battlespace sensor and node rather than merely a strike platform.
• Command and Control Reform: Distributed operations required revised command philosophy. Centralised control structures risked decision lag incompatible with sensor-driven warfare. Plan Jericho implementation encouraged mission command adaptation within an air context, aligning decision-making speed with information velocity.
• Logistics and Sustainment Digitisation: Fifth-generation aircraft impose data-intensive sustainment demands. Without digital logistics reform, readiness rates risk degradation. Implementation during 2016–2017 included preparatory adjustments to maintenance, data security, and sustainment processes to prevent technical dependency from constraining operational freedom.
• Institutional Identity Shift: Perhaps the most consequential reform was conceptual. The RAAF redefined itself from a collection of platforms to a combat system integrator. This cultural shift reflected long-term doctrinal evolution emphasising effects over platforms . Implementation embedded that shift into practice, not merely rhetoric.

Official Sources and Records

(Paste sources and instructions below into an AI to locate the sources.)
Instructions to AI: Locate the cited official history, archival series, or institutional record using the citation text provided; supply current links and identify the controlling authority.

• Royal Australian Air Force, Plan Jericho (AF14), Air and Space Power Centre, Canberra, 2015.
• Royal Australian Air Force, Plan Jericho Program of Works, AF18 (2nd Edition), Air and Space Power Centre, Canberra, 2017.
• Australian Government, 2016 Defence White Paper, Department of Defence, Canberra, February 2016.
• Department of Defence, “First F-35A aircraft arrive in Australia,” Defence News Release, December 2018.
• Department of Defence, “RAAF declares Initial Operating Capability for F-35A,” Defence News Release, December 2020.
• Department of Defence, “A new way of looking at battlespaces,” Defence News, 12 April 2021.
• Department of Defence, “10 years of innovation: Air Force celebrates Jericho,” Defence News, 30 March 2025.
• Royal Australian Air Force, “Jericho Disruptive Innovation,” official RAAF communications and media releases, 2016–2022.